1st December 2022

Confidant Classes

Competitors' very first choice

Home | Edu NEWS | Padmanabhaswamy temple

Padmanabhaswamy temple

On Monday Supreme Court of India, sided with the former royal family of Travancore for the administration and control of the Padmanabha Swamy temple in Kerala. Resolving the long-standing dispute, the High Court quashed the January 2011 decision of the Kerala High Court, which had ruled that the state government should take control of the temple from a trust led by the old family royal.

  • The temple became the center of attention after the high court of justice in May 2011 ordered a detailed inventory of the objects in the vaults of the temple, which have long been said to be of immense wealth. When five of its six vaults, known as “Kallara” in Malayalam, were opened in accordance with the court order, a vast treasure trove of gold and other priceless objects were discovered.
  • The intrinsic value of the treasure has been estimated at more than Rs 90,000 crore. One of the vaults, Kallara B, could not be opened and the opening of the vaults was suspended by the Supreme Court.
  • In August 2012, Supreme Lawyer Gopal Subramanium was appointed Amicus Curiae (friend of the court) by the Supreme Court, he filed a voluminous report in court in April 2014 alleging serious mismanagement of the temple by the trust and accusing the royal family for various reasons.
  • The temple was under the control of a trust led by the family of former royalty members until April 2014, when the superior court, by a crucial interim order, handed over its management to a four-member administrative committee headed by a district judge.
  • The legal origin of the dispute lies in the Accession Agreement (Agreement) signed between the Kings of Travancore with the Government of India in 1949, by which the Princely State of Travancore became part of the Indian Union.
  • Article VII of the agreement states that the administration of the Padmanabha Swamy Temple will be carried out, under the control and supervision of the sovereign of Travancore, by an executive officer appointed by the sovereign.
  • The main legal question was whether Utradam Thirunal Marthanda Varma, the younger brother of Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, the last Travancore sovereign, could claim to be the “Travancore sovereign” after the leader’s death in 1991.
  • The court examined this claim in the limited sense of this term, in accordance with the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act of 1950, to claim ownership, control and administration of the ancient Sree Padmanabha Swamy temple.
  • All temples that were under the control and management of the former princely states of Travancore and Cochin were under the control of the Councils of Travancore and Cochin Devaswom before 1947.
  • However, in accordance with the instrument of accession signed between the states Princely and the government of In India, since 1949, the administration of the Padmanabhaswamy temple was “entrusted” to the sovereign of Travancore.
  • The state of Kerala was carved in 1956, but the temple continued to be administered by royalty in the past.
  • In 1971, the private scholarships of former members of the royal family were abolished by a constitutional amendment that removed their rights and privileges.
  • This decision was confirmed in court in 1993 and the last Travancore leader to die during the course of this case has continued to handle the affairs of the temple until then.
  • In 1991, when the last brother of the sovereign took over the temple, he caused a fury among the faithful who transferred the courts to a long legal battle.
  • The government has joined; supporting the petitioner’s claims that Marthanda Varma had no legal right to claim control or administration of the temple.
  • The character of the temple has always been recognized as a public institution governed by law. The argument of the royal family is that the administration of the temple would belong to them in perpetuity, according to custom.
  • Although the last sovereign Balarama Varma executed a detailed will that bequeathed his personal property, he did not include the Sree Padmanabhaswamy temple as his personal property or dealt with it in his will.
  • One consequence of who has administrative rights to the temple is whether the temple vaults will be open. In 2007 Marthanda Varma claimed that the temple treasures were owned by the royal family.
  • Several lawsuits have been filed to oppose this claim, and a court of first instance in Kerala has issued a court order against the opening of vaults.
  • In its 2011 decision, the Kerala High Court issued an order for the establishment of a board of directors to administer the affairs of the temple against the royal family.
  • The appeal against this verdict was immediately filed by the royal family and the SC suspended the HC’s verdict.
  • In appointing two amicus curiae: Chief Counsel Gopal Subramaniam and former Indian Controller and Auditor General Vinod Rai to prepare an inventory of items in the vaults.
  • While five of the six boxes were opened, box B did not open. The royal family had claimed that a mythical curse was associated with the opening of Vault B.
  • Since 2011, the process of opening the vaults has led to the discovery of treasures within the Padmanabhaswamy temple, sparking debate over who owns the temple’s assets and how to regulate them.
  • Although it is a secular country that separates religion from state affairs, Hindu temples, its assets are governed by statutory laws and councils tightly controlled by state governments.
  • This system was created mainly through the development of a legal framework to prohibit untouchability by treating temples as public lands; Many legal battles have resulted.
AILET 2023 Application Process Begins

AILET 2023 Application Process Begins

National Law University-Delhi NLU-Delhi will hold the AILET 2023 exam on December 11, 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. m. to…
Read More
All India Bar Examination 17 Syllabus and other details

All India Bar Examination 17 Syllabus and other details

AIBE 17 exam: Nearly one lakh candidates will take the AIBE exam this year, which will be held at 150…
Read More
AIBE 17 will take place in 3 months: BCI informs the Supreme Court

AIBE 17 will take place in 3 months: BCI informs the Supreme Court

Bar Council of India informed the Supreme Court that the syllabus for the upcoming All India Bar Examination 17 (AIBE17)…
Read More
Registration for CLAT 2023 will begin on August 8

Registration for CLAT 2023 will begin on August 8

CLAT 2023 will be held offline on December 18. Applicants can complete the online application form at consortiumofnlus.ac.in. CLAT 2023:…
Read More
AP LAWCET 2022 Results Declared

AP LAWCET 2022 Results Declared

Confidant-Classes-Judiciary AP LAWCET 2022 Results: Candidates who sat for the AP Common Entrance Test (AP LAWCET 2022) will now be…
Read More
Law graduates not practising since more than 5 years, must retake AIBE: BCI tells the Supreme Court

Law graduates not practising since more than 5 years, must retake AIBE: BCI tells the Supreme Court

The BCI has ruled that if a lawyer accepts a job not related to legal or judicial matters, then that…
Read More
Careers after Law

Careers after Law

Law has become the most common option in India at the moment. It has evolved and grown tremendously over time….
Read More
DU LLB Entrance Exam 2022 decoded

DU LLB Entrance Exam 2022 decoded

The University of Delhi will conduct the entrance exam of DU LLB 2O22 tentatively in next month. The university had…
Read More
UG-CLAT 2023 Exam Pattern

UG-CLAT 2023 Exam Pattern

The UG-CLAT 2023 would focus on the assessment of the candidates’ comprehension and reasoning abilities and skills. In general, it…
Read More
70-Year-Old Fortunate to Complete LLM | University of Delhi Centenary Chance Initiative

70-Year-Old Fortunate to Complete LLM | University of Delhi Centenary Chance Initiative

Under the University of Delhi’s Centenary Chance initiative, a 70-year-old man is given the chance to complete his LLM after…
Read More

About Post Author

error

Enjoy this? Please spread the word :)