19th January 2021

Confidant Classes

A Premier Judicial Service Coaching

Amy Coney Barrett used the term “sexual preference”

During her confirmation hearings on Capitol Hill earlier this week, US Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett sparked considerable outrage when she used the widely denounced term “sexual preference” to discuss LGBTQI rights. .

  • Barrett referenced this phrase when asked about the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Obergfell v. Hodges (2015), who overturned the ban on same-sex marriages in all 50 US states.
  • Hawaii Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono condemned his choice of words, calling the term “offensive” and “outdated”.
  • Meanwhile, Barrett’s comments received widespread backlash on social media, with various members of the LGBTQI community and advocacy groups criticizing her for her callousness.
  • In fact, renowned dictionary and reference book publisher Merriam Webster even updated its online definition of the term “sexual preference” after the incident, to indicate its offensive nature.

What was Amy Coney Barrett’s controversial statement?

  • On the second day of the Supreme Court election confirmation hearings of President Donald Trump, Amy Coney Barrett, Senator Dianne Feinstein asked if the candidate shared the views of her mentor, Justice Antonin Scalia on interpersonal marriage. of the same sex. Judge Scalia was known to consistently speak out against gay rights, Feinstein noted.
  • Feinstein asked if Barrett would also be “a coherent vote to roll back hard-fought freedoms and protections for the LGBT community.” To this, Barrett replied that she “had no agenda,” a phrase Scalia himself used in his own confirmation hearing.

“I want to make it clear that I have never discriminated based on sexual preference and that I would not discriminate based on sexual preference.”

Barret
  • Barret’s appointment to the Supreme Court has angered LGBTQI groups and advocates across the country as many fear that her personal ultra-conservative views and legal approach threaten the rights of sexual minorities.
  • During the hearing, Barrett declined to tell senators whether he would vote to overturn rulings that provide legal protection for same-sex marriage.

But why is the use of the term “sexual preference” controversial ?

  • Members and advocates of the LGBTQI community often find the term “sexual preference” offensive because it implies that sexuality is a choice.
  • The phrase suggests that who a person chooses as a romantic or sexual partner is simply based on their personal preferences, which have the potential to change.
  • In an article published in 1991, the American Psychological Association (APA) wrote: “The word preference suggests a degree of voluntary choice that is not necessarily informed by lesbians and gay men and that has not been proven in psychological research.”
  • “The term ‘sexual preference’ is generally used to suggest that being a lesbian, gay or bisexual is an option and therefore can and should be ‘cured,'” the prominent American LGBTQI alliance GLAAD notes in a guide. reference for the media.
  • The idea that sexual minorities can be “cured,” implying that their sexuality is a disease, has long been promoted by right-wing Christian groups in the United States.
  • Today, the term “sexual preference” has largely been replaced by “sexual orientation” because it clears up ambiguity and recognizes that sexuality is a key part of a person’s identity.

What was the response to the statement?

  • Sen. Mazie Hirono later criticized the candidate for using the “offensive and outdated term.” “It is used by anti-LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. This is not the case, ”said the senator.
  • She went on to say that if Barrett truly believed that “sexual orientation is just a preference,” then the LGBTQ community should be “rightly concerned” about whether the judge will uphold their constitutional right to marry if it remains. .
  • Apologizing for her comments, Barrett said she had no intention of “harming the LGBTQ community.” “So if I did, I’m really sorry,” he said. “I just wanted to talk about Obergefell’s mandate for same-sex marriage.”
  • Barrett’s comments also sparked a widespread reaction on social media. Sharing a video of the incident on Twitter, the Washington DC-based National Center for Women’s Rights wrote: “Not a ‘preference,’ Judge Barrett.
  • GLAAD also condemned his comments. “The correct term is sexual orientation. “Sexual preference” is a term anti-LGBTQ activists often use to indicate that sexual orientation is a choice, ”the organization tweeted.
  • Soon after, Merriam Webster updated her online definition of the term “sexual preference” to indicate its offensive nature.
  • “The term sexual preference, as used to refer to sexual orientation, is considered offensive in its implicit suggestion that a person can choose who they are sexually or romantically attracted to,” it now reads.
  • The dictionary editor has since confirmed that the entry was in fact updated due to Barrett’s controversial comments during the Supreme Court confirmation hearing.
Judiciary FAQ’s Download

Judiciary FAQ’s Download

WWW.CONFIDANTCLASSES.IN-1Download
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 16.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 16.01.2021

Covaxin recipients have been asked to sign consent form in “clinical trial mode” India began its Covid-19 vaccination campaign on…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 15.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 15.01.2021

No progress in talks between the Center and the agricultural unions The ninth round of talks between the Center and…
Read More
Section 230, the law used to ban Donald Trump on Twitter?

Section 230, the law used to ban Donald Trump on Twitter?

Shortly after a slew of President Donald Trump supporters stormed the United States Capitol last week, their social media accounts…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 14.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 14.01.2021

Modi to launch vaccination campaign on January 16 Prime Minister Narendra Modi will launch the COVID-19 vaccination campaign across India…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 13.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 13.01.2021

Agriculture Ministry denies RTI consultation on agricultural law consultations, saying it is sub judice Agriculture Ministry rejected Right to Information…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 12.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 12.01.2021

Supreme Court suspends agricultural laws, forms committee over farmers’ objections The Supreme Court on Tuesday suspended the implementation of three…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 11.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 11.01.2021

SC says it intends to stay agricultural laws The Supreme Court said on Monday that it intends to suspend the…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 10.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 10.01.2021

Accumulation of Chinese in LAC is clearly visible, Ladakh leader says Konchok Stanzin, an adviser to Chushul in eastern Ladakh,…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 09.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 09.01.2021

The first phase of vaccination will start on January 16 India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign is expected to start on January…
Read More
Daily NEWS Summary: 08.01.2021

Daily NEWS Summary: 08.01.2021

“Ghar wapsi” only after “wapsi law”, say the farmers, because the eighth round of negotiations is inconclusive The eighth round…
Read More
error

Enjoy this? Please spread the word :)